[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#626367: live-build: manpage has bad FILES section



Package: live-build
Version: 2.0.12-2
Severity: normal

The live-build(7) manual page has a FILES section like this:

    FILES
       n/a

This is a bit pointless: either list relevant files, or remove the section.

The file I was actually looking for should be listed in the lb_build(1)
manpage: /etc/live/build.conf. The manpage now only lists auto/build.

-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages live-build depends on:
ii  debootstrap              1.0.26+squeeze1 Bootstrap a basic Debian system

Versions of packages live-build recommends:
ii  cpio                          2.11-4     GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  gnu-fdisk                     1.2.4-3+b1 Linux fdisk replacement based on l

Versions of packages live-build suggests:
ii  dosfstools           3.0.9-1             utilities for making and checking 
ii  fakeroot             1.14.4-1            Gives a fake root environment
ii  genisoimage          9:1.1.11-1          Creates ISO-9660 CD-ROM filesystem
pn  memtest86+ | memtest <none>              (no description available)
ii  mtools               4.0.12-1            Tools for manipulating MSDOS files
pn  parted               <none>              (no description available)
pn  squashfs-tools | gen <none>              (no description available)
ii  sudo                 1.7.4p4-2.squeeze.2 Provide limited super user privile
pn  syslinux | grub      <none>              (no description available)
pn  uuid-runtime         <none>              (no description available)
pn  win32-loader         <none>              (no description available)

-- no debconf information



Reply to: