On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Daniel Baumann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On 05/20/2010 06:58 AM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:i'm feeling bad about having internal variables made usable to the
> Since this is a
> rare use case for most users, I've abstained from further complicating
> lh_config and the config files (for now at least) - hopefully this is
> okay with you as well.
outside, and then e.g. you depending on it as it's likely that they
could be broken by accident sometimes. i'll think about something, maybe
i'll have a better idea.
The way its named (LH_ prefix) indicates to me its not an 'internal' variable; maybe at one point it was meant to be exposed as an option?
However, I agree that we should probably give more thought as to how we want to handle more advanced and esoteric options that we don't want to confuse/bother regular users with.