Re: RFC: live-initramfs 2.x features
Daniel Baumann wrote (25 Jan 2010 19:19:12 GMT) :
> Philippe Lelédy wrote:
>> 2) persistent=home to bypass global persistence.
> persistency needs to be redone, this is one of the reasons to do
> exactely. had that already in mind :)
Are there any plans for the persistency redo?
We have plans  to implement some bits of persistency in
T(A)ILS , and wonder if it is worth basing new work on
live-initramfs 1.x persistency features (e.g. home-sn).
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| The impossible just takes a bit longer.