Re: RFC: live-initramfs 2.x features
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:08:44AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Also consider the security of the vmlinux/initramfs. Is adding more
> > security later really useful?
> if you can't trust the kernel and initrd, you're almost lost anyway.
While not a personal interest of mine, it seems that there are those who
don't trust the kernel and initrd: