Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31
Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> where was this discussed?
> Bug report #517130
which is one single message, not a discussion.
> and the Debian kernel team meeting in Portland.
in private then, behind 'closed doors'. :/
>> how will be binary modules provided in the future?
> In general they should be built using DKMS or module-assistant.
that's unacceptable for those modules that are required by debian-live,
which is $unionfs and loop-aes.
>> why was debian-live not informed about it, it's critical part of
>> the distribution for building live images.
> I've added aufs2 to the kernel image packages precisely because Debian
> Live needs it.
thanks, but please do inform debian-live next time in advance.
> Is there anything else you need?
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist