Re: [PATCHES] fix for Ubuntu support, live-initramfs
Steven Shiau wrote:
> From http://aufs.sourceforge.net/
> Note: it becomes clear that "Aufs was rejected. Let's give it up."
> According to Christoph Hellwig, linux rejects all union-type filesystems
> but UnionMount.
i might be wrong, but isn't that why there's aufs2?
> Therefore in the future, maybe it's better that live-initramfs can
> support unionfs-fuse, and unionmount.
even tough having unionfs-fuse optionally arround would be nice, i'd
always prefere kernel based union (as long as it's
possible/maintainable). it's way faster, and pulling in fuse into the
initrd is quite much (for systems with low ram).
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist