Re: Wiki / manual / docs
On Tuesday 07 October 2008, 16:30:22, Charles Johnson wrote:
> I have recently been reading the manual and no doubt shall do so again.
> When I do, I don't see any reason why I should not proof-read it as I go
> along. Let me know if that's a good idea and how to proceed.
> btw, what's the etiquette on posting in (minimal) html format to this
> list? If text only is preferred, that's no problem
The source for Live Manual is in docbook xml, but I think that plain text
could be accepted although it will need manual merge.
A way better will be to publish an alioth git repository clone of the main
live-manual's one  linked there , or just send git patches from a local
Anyway I would like to ask Chris Lamb for that issue.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.