[RFC] The future of LH_BINARY_IMAGES
Chris Lamb wrote:
> * I don't see how some of the lh_binary_* helpers can even support it being
> For example, lh_binary_syslinux does completely different things
> depending on the binary image type, so the side effects of this helper
> cannot be invariant for all image types. Thus, we cannot simply re-use the
> same binary/ directory for each item in LH_BINARY_IMAGES, not least of all
> because we cannot export overriding vars to sub-helpers due to the way
> configuration files take precedence over environment vars.
instead of building binary/, one could build multiple binary.$flavour
> If no-one has any major objections or queries I'll go ahead and cleanup the
> code to assume that LH_BINARY_IMAGES contains a single value.
i'd like to give it a try again, so please wait with this.
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baumann at panthera-systems.net