Re: FLTK License
Olive <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> If I understand it well; the amendments of the LGPL are not removable
> (it is not explicitly said to be removable so by default it is not).
> But It seems then that this license might in fact be incompatible with
> the LPGL.
They appear to be additional permissions, so are GPL-compatible IMO.
> In particular it prevents to relicence FLTK under the pure GPL
> which is normally allowed by the LGPL.
Rather, it would be under the GPL plus additional permissions.
> Any derivative works of FLTK have
> to be distributed with the additional permissions and that [...]
I don't see why authors of derived works have to grant the additional
permissions. Where is that requirement?
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct