Re: DFSG compatibility of the "Poetic License"
Ben Finney <email@example.com> writes:
> Maximilian Gaß <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > No warranty express or implied.
> What happens where this conflicts with the very common situation where
> there *is* an implied license required by the jurisdiction: does the
> license still apply? Which parts apply?
That should read “… an implied warranty required by the jurisdiction …”.
\ “What is it that makes a complete stranger dive into an icy |
`\ river to save a solid gold baby? Maybe we'll never know.” —Jack |
_o__) Handey |