On sam, 2008-03-22 at 22:33 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote: > > Have you considered the GNU LGPL (v2.1)? > > > Yes, but I encountered strong resistance from FSF when proposing a > "lighter" (with exceptions) LGPL version. This is, again, because you are not proposing additional permissions (for which the LGPL with extra additional permissions would be fine) but additional *restrictions*. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=