Re: Eiffel Forum License v2 [was: Re: Choosing a License: GNU APL? AFL 3.0?]

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Eiffel Forum License v2 [was: Re: Choosing a License: GNU APL? AFL 3.0?]
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:17:03 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] flfoav$ekr$1@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <b6bb4d890712300055h77236e34n458efc5d17508c24@mail.gmail.com> <20071230113202.06b731ca.frx@firenze.linux.it> <b6bb4d890712300457w2bee5214j276539eee11f53ee@mail.gmail.com> <20071230175929.68edab99.frx@firenze.linux.it> <b6bb4d890712300951s4ec6caa4r37fcf443aceac761@mail.gmail.com> <20071231014738.ECAFB4F686@nail.towers.org.uk> <b6bb4d890712310243q26f330e4m347f2929e78f780d@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080101111850.24fe2b42.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] b6bb4d890801010729h52c9e9fdgb71ec46e4dd3e948@mail.gmail.com>

sean@miscoranda.com wrote:

>Perhaps I haven't been subscribed long enough or something, but I've
>found the exact opposite. Certainly the feedback that I've got has
>been tough and debatory. But it's also been prompt. It's been polite.
>It's been terse and informative, and all emails I've received so far
>have been, I think, written with the spirit of helpfulness.
You forgot the "being right" part, which some people believe to be quite
important...

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

References:
- Eiffel Forum License v2 [was: Re: Choosing a License: GNU APL? AFL 3.0?]
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: Eiffel Forum License v2 [was: Re: Choosing a License: GNU APL? AFL 3.0?]
  - From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@miscoranda.com>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenCascade license opinion
Next by Date: Debian List Conduct (Was: Re: Choosing a &c.)
Previous by thread: Reputations of debian-legal (was: Eiffel Forum License v2)
Next by thread: Reputations of debian-legal [was: Eiffel Forum License v2]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread