On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:57:52 +0930 Paul Wise wrote: > On Nov 18, 2007 3:18 AM, Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote: > > > but the license text does not seem to be much changed. > > There are licence differences to the one I posted before, but that was > just because they made a mistake in which version of the licence to > post on the site. > > I don't think they actually read the discussion on debian-legal. I > think if everyone who had concerns with the previous licence that are > not addressed in the final one could send their feedback to the > contact address, that would be better than me asking them to read the > archives again. Which is the contact address? I failed to find any e-mail address on the website[1]. Should I (gasp!) use that horrible contact form[2]? [1] http://www.stixfonts.org/ [2] http://www.aip.org/stixfonts/contact.jsp?eid=205 -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp9r8aPJfH9b.pgp
Description: PGP signature