Re: A use case of GPLv3 section 7b
On 9/6/07, Francesco Poli <email@example.com> wrote:
> Can logos be considered "reasonable legal notices" or "author
> What do you think?
A logo definitely isn't a legal notice, but it *could* be an author
attribution (although to me it seems more a project attribution or
even an advertisement.) If it is considered an author attribution,
it's still only reasonable where the code is used as originally
intended in a graphical environment. If the code were somehow adapted
for non-graphical use there'd be issues.
Andrew Donnellan <><
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
firstname.lastname@example.org hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
Spammers only === email@example.com ===