Re: Debian-approved creative/content license?

["Andrew Donnellan" <ajdlinux@gmail.com>]

On 3/11/07, Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've read up and found the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses are
> specifically disallowed by Debian (well GFDL with non-invariant
> sections seems ok, but does that make sense for creative/audio
> content?).  Looking further, I could not find any Debian-approved
> licenses for creative (non-software) works [2], [3].  Is the Debian
> approach to just use a software license like GPL or BSD for creative
> content?
>
> Anyway, what recommendation should I make that will satisfy the DFSG?
> Thank you for your constructive thoughts.

I'd recommend just using the GPL or Expat licenses, they are tried and
tested and don't contain anything too specific to software.

--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary)    ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com         http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
ajdlinux@jabber.org.au             hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
           http://linux.org.au    http://debian.org
       Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
       Spammers only === ajdspambucket@exemail.com.au ===