On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:21:34 +0000 (GMT) MJ Ray wrote: > Evan Prodromou <evan@debian.org> [...] > > [...] I also believe that a large number of debian-legal > > participants have said that the DRM clause, as it stands, is free > > enough to allow distribution under DRM if such DRM is not > > "effective" [...] > > I'm now sufficiently confused by CC/DRM/DReaM and others that I would > advise everyone to run away, run away from that lawyerbomb. I seem > to remember that RMS also advised people to avoid promoting CC until > they sort out what the devil they stand for. Until we see a few of > the anti-TPM zealots try to use CC to punish parallel distribution, > we probably won't know what the current licence means in practical > terms. Agreed fully. -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpUjAHBMHExR.pgp
Description: PGP signature