[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Acknowledgment clause in GPL code?



On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:13:10AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:

> That is a completely different aspect of the issue.
> I apologize for not being clear enough: I was talking about the
> sentences outside the GPL text.

> So, to state the matter in a (hopefully) clearer way: AFAICS, the
> sentence

> | IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR
> | MODIFIED WITHOUT EXPLICIT CREDIT GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR.

> refers to the original author as "THE AUTHOR" and hence asks for credit
> to the original author.

> On the other hand, everything that is required by the GPL text must be
> done in order to exercize the granted permissions.

> One important thing that is still to be clarified is the nature of those
> sentences outside the GPL text: are they explanations for lay persons or
> additional restrictions?

This is not an additional restriction; this is a requirement set out in
copyright law that has not been waived in the GPL, so since the copyright
holder has not stated anywhere that this is intended as a license addendum,
I think it's reasonable to understand it as an explanation instead.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: