On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:57:08 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> > > On the other hand, being able to identify all contributors is vital > > for reviewing the copyright status of a program, should there be any > > doubt or copyright infringement claims. Being able to identify contributors is needed only *if* the copyright license is unclear or contradictory. On the other hand, when everything is properly released in a clearly DFSG-free manner, there's no need to know the real identity of all contributors, IMHO. > > Programs with an unclear > > copyright situation cannot be considered free, IMHO. I agree, but I re-stress (for clarity) that IMHO anonymous author does not necessarily mean unclear copyright situation. > > I disagree, at the extreme. If it's *provably* so unclear that no-one > can enforce a copyright over it, then it's effectively in the public > domain and so free. AFAICT, copyright laws allow an author to release a work in an anonymous or pseudonymous manner and, at the same time, let the work be copyrighted. > However, you are far more likely to hit > 'lawyerbomb' than 'free' and it's better to try to clarify. Huh? What do you need to clarify? As long as the work is clearly released in a DFSG-free manner, I don't think there's any need to clarify further... -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpsiP5gw2QV9.pgp
Description: PGP signature