[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Open CASCADE Technology Public License



Macallister Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
> Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
>> Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> wrote:
>> > The problematic kind of trademark clauses is the one that says "you
>> > lose your _copyright_ license if you use our trademark in ways we're
>> > not happy with".
>> 
>> Why is that any more problematic than the 3-clause BSD license?
> 
> It's about arbitrary marks, not someone's name.  Why do you think
> they are comparable?

If the objection is "It's a breach of the copyright license to break the 
law in this specific manner", then they're directly comparable.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org



Reply to: