> > Is there any legal reason why sharpmusique is not in Debian, given that > > multiple .deb packages already exist? > > If you're going to ask about a license (which is what I assume you are > doing), please include the license in question (unless it is in > /usr/share/common-licenses). In this case, the license in question is > the GNU General Public License, version 2. > > I see no legal reason why this is not in Debian. I do see a technical > reason: no one wants to make packages, apparently, since the RFP in > question is still open (345903). I realize that the license works, and I apologize for not mentioning that. I just wondered if there were any DMCA-related issues, not knowing what implication those have on Debian, inasmuch as the package was created by reverse-engineering a proprietary protocol. thanks, Charles -- Soldier Sailor And marine Now get a shave That's quick and clean Burma-Shave http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1941/soldier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature