Re: Against DRM 2.0

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Against DRM 2.0
From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 19:35:50 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1148322950.419499.24636.nullmailer@klnet.towers.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 1148044457.22233.181.camel@zhora.1481ruerachel.net> <[🔎] 20060519143618.31992.qmail@web35212.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 1007a32a0605191728t672dc955v8b0fdfc117a3e814@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1148296663.441026.5490.nullmailer@klnet.towers.org.uk>

MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
> I think that DRM-inhibiting licences are possible, but the

s/are/that follow the DFSG are/ #oops!

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Against DRM 2.0
  - From: Evan Prodromou <evan@debian.org>
- Re: Against DRM 2.0
  - From: Max Brown <max05001@yahoo.com>
- Re: Against DRM 2.0
  - From: "Andrew Donnellan" <ajdlinux@gmail.com>
- Re: Against DRM 2.0
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>

Prev by Date: Re: Sun Java available from non-free
Next by Date: Re: Sun Java available from non-free
Previous by thread: Re: Against DRM 2.0
Next by thread: Re: Against DRM 2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread