Re: Proposed licence for Debconf video recordings
Scripsit Francesco Poli <email@example.com>
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:56:21 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
>> -distributed with all copies and transcodings of the recording or
>> +distributed with all copies, transformations and adaptations of the work or
>> substantial portions thereof.
> I'm not sure if this phrasing tries to require that transformations and
> adaptations (a subset of derivative works) be licensed under the same
> license as the original work.
I cannot see how this is different from how BSD licenses require that
the BSD copyright blurb *itself* is retained with all derivates.
Everybody seems to agree that this does not make the BSD license
viral, and that a derivor is free to give fewer rights to his part of
the copyright in the derived work than the original BSD author gave to
Henning Makholm "I ... I have to return some videos."