On 5/18/06, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > First off, I'm going to completely ignore the FAQ as the FAQ and the > license both specifies that the FAQ does not have any legal validity. Repeating frequently asked questions that have already been answered isn't terribly useful.
But I guess the question should be answered by the license, not by the FAQ.
> As a final note, did anyone from Debian who usually examines licences > actually examine this one? Yes.
Who?