Re: Bacula license (was Re: Help Selecting License for Bacula Documentation
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:54:46PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I have just discovered that Bacula has a problematic clause in its license.
Thanks for mentioning this, Nathanael. I had read the license, but had
assumed (incorrectly, I guess) that Jose had already evaluated it here
before uploading the package.
[ snip ]
> This is an additional restriction beyond those in the GPL. Therefore this
> renders the license GPL-incompatible. Which is a major problem since other
> parts of Bacula are licensed under pure GPL. :-P
Does the permission to link with OpenSSL also make it GPL-incompatible?
How about the Windows clauses, which of course don't apply to us?