Re: Bug#363061: Implicit granting of rights?
Josh Triplett <email@example.com> wrote:
> No, it falls just on the wrong side; licenses can restrict the name of
> the *work*, as in the human-parsable name, but filenames serve as a
> functional component of a work. This issue came up with the previous
> version of the LPPL.
You are right. Let's just remove it, it's obsolete cruft anyway, useful
only for some hypothetical centuries-old documents.
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)