Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software
Gregory Colpart <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> I want to package Forwards (see my ITP ), a non-Apache
> software under Apache License 1.1 ).
 is not the Apache License 1.1, but is Apache-1.1-like.
I think your ITP License line is incorrect.
> I read debian-legal archives to have information about
> Apache License version 1.1. Situation seems confuse on the first
> thread . This thread  explains there is no problem for
> Apache software under Apache License.
 concerns GPL-compatibility. Are you combining with GPL work?
> Note that I am intent to call my Debian package 'sork-forwards-h3'
> and with very few patches for upstream version. Note also there are
> already packages with this license in "main" : sork-passwd-h3,
> ingo1, jython, et cetera.
Have the Horde Project given written permission for that? It would
help avoid the uncertainty.
> Could you confirm me that my package will be DFSG-compliant ?
Not entirely, but it looks like it probably will be.
>  : http://bugs.debian.org/362652
>  : http://cvs.horde.org/co.php?r=220.127.116.11&f=forwards%2FLICENSE&p=1
>  : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/06/msg00103.html
>  : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00205.html
Hope that helps,
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct