Re: license of schema files
> kolabd was rejected by ftpmaster because of this schema license text
> The text is the same like the one from core.schema from openldap2.2
That's really strange. How can one include 'Portions' of something
when forbidden to modify it in any way?
> Can anybody tell me what to do:
> a. include rfc2739.schema because its like core.schema?
Not without talking to ftpmaster, unless you like rejection.
> b. write a bug against openldap2.2 because they have the same problem?
> c. maybe it rfc releated and need waiting for RFC license discussion (i
> dont know the status of it)?
The RFC copyright licence problems have been discussed. See
for one possibly relevant thread (anyone got a better link?)
> d. something else?
Find a way to avoid the copyright material and achieve the same
effect as using it.
Sorry there's no easy answers :-/
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct