[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ttf-dejavu and Bitstream's license (bug#353462)



> From: Christian Hammers <ch@d...an.org>
> Subject: Bug#353462: ttf-dejavu: license prohibits advertising with
> Bitstream name - description uses them
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
> 
> So...
> - is this "advertising" at all

I think that's unclear. I don't think so, but I don't know the law on
it. Fortunately:

> - is "Bitstream" the name of "Bitstream Inc." or would it only be a
>   problem if we added the "Inc." to the description

I'm fairly sure that Bitstream Vera isn't the name of Bitstream Inc.
http://www.gnome.org/fonts/ names them Bitstream Vera, as well as
just Vera. Presumably the description could s/Bitstream// without
loss of meaning if there's any doubt, though.

-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct



Reply to: