On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:19:52 +0100 Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include <hallo.h> > * Francesco Poli [Tue, Mar 21 2006, 12:18:37AM]: [...] > > I used to hope that "ignoring upstream insane statements" doesn't > > include ignoring DFSG-freeness issues with the package, though!! > > :-( > > Relax. Let's expect an answer to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350739 - either > cdrtools will be declared as licensed under the GPL or not under GPL, > then we know what we are on. And yes, we shold face the possibility of > the removal of cdrtools from Debian. It's hard to relax in these strange days, when some serious licensing bugs are magically declared non-bugs by the majority of the project (see GR-2006-001)... :-((((( Anyway, let's go on waiting (I've been waiting since september 2004...). > > > > > since dvdrtools is in non-free too... > > > > > > Someone's launched an investigation into the reason for this. > > > Let's wait and see what comes back. > > > > Assuming that its debian/copyright file is accurate (in Debian sid), > > it seems that the same license (and added restrictions, passed off > > as "license interpretation") applies. > > If this is the case, my bet is that dvdrtools is in non-free for > > pretty the same reason why cdrtools should not be in main (at least, > > not as it is now)... > > Awkward! :-((( > > Don't count much on dvdrtools, it has no active upstream at all (no, I > don't mean the guys whoes only heroic act was the replacement of the > Schilly build system with autodev-stuff). That's a good reason to find someone willing to take over dvdrtools maintenance and development... We should really seek someone interested. -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp4Y0LwHKphv.pgp
Description: PGP signature