Re: Daniel Wallace case vs. FSF thrown out, ordered to pay costs

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Daniel Wallace case vs. FSF thrown out, ordered to pay costs
From: "Alexander Terekhov" <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:58:28 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] e52efbe10603220358l5fac326cge5b28ce20653183f@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060321215318.GE10857@redwald.deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20060321215318.GE10857@redwald.deadbeast.net>

Well, you could have won EURO 50.

Wanna bet whether Wallace will appeal and/or file Rule 60 Motion first?

I bet EURO 50 that he will. Who's playing?

regards,
alexander.

Reply to:

References:
- Daniel Wallace case vs. FSF thrown out, ordered to pay costs
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos...
Next by Date: Re: BOLA licence (darcsweb): free or not?
Previous by thread: Re: Daniel Wallace case vs. FSF thrown out, ordered to pay costs
Next by thread: compartibility of license of Wild Magic library with the Debian main and non-free repositories
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread