Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs
neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)
> And the license-free graphics files. These probably have a better
> claim to be "part of emacs" and under the general license than the
> rest, because there's no place to put a separate license statement
> in these files.
Some of these files look like C code. Can't the licence info be put
in a C comment in them? Some of them like emacs.icon already have a
comment. Either way, these don't seem a huge worry.
> emacs.icon
> emacs.xbm
> gnu.xpm
> gnus-pointer.xbm
> gnus-pointer.xpm
> gnus.pbm
> gnus.xpm
> letter.xbm
> splash.pbm
> splash.xpm
> splash8.xpm
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: