[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Interpretation of the GFDL in light of the recent GR



Andrew Donnellan wrote:

>On 3/17/06, Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>   1. Does the term "technical measures" as used in GFDL 2's "you may
>>    
>>
>
>Don't you mean 1.2?
>  
>
That should have a "section" in there: GFDL, Section 2.



Reply to: