Re: Interpretation of the GR
Nathanael Nerode <email@example.com> writes:
> I still think such a philosophy is an invitation to get in legal
> trouble, but it seems to be the preferred choice of the developers.
> At least Debian still believes in removing stuff without free licenses
> from Debian if the licensors decide to actually enforce their licenses
> as written.
But the GR didn't say anything about any license other than the GFDL. I
don't think it's justified to claim that the developers who voted for
the GR were pushing a new philosophy for interpreting licenses without
Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03