Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL
On 3/16/06, Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
> One thing that springs to mind is to start doing summaries of traffic on
> Debian-legal (again). Its has been tried before, but turns out to be too
> much work for every victim^Wvolunteer so far.
Way back in February last year, MJ Ray and I were tossing around the
idea of resurrecting the summaries in a new fleshed-out form [0].
Unfortunately, real life goings-on drew me away, the discussion
petered out without reaching a conclusion, and somehow I never managed
to get back to it. But I'm game for another attempt - I'll give
summarizing this coming week's (20th - 26th) traffic a go.
As that rather ancient prototype document says at the very top,
feedback is most welcome as to how it might be improved. MJ's already
kindly pointed out the risks of editorializing (which I shall do my
utmost to avoid) and the fact that one shouldn't summarize threads
that are still active (I'll follow the "3 day rule" [1] from now on).
[0] http://www.dur.ac.uk/andrew.saunders/14th-20th_Feb.html
[1] http://kt.earth.li/summaryfaq.html#3day
Cheers,
--
Andrew Saunders
Reply to: