Re: sugarcrm licence issue
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 05:42:07PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> This is based on the contents of their copyright files. Can we please
> stop this "The only code under the MPL is Mozilla" argument?
It's not an "argument"--nobody is claiming that a license is free or non-
free based on whether or not the license is being used. (I'm a bit
disappointed that you're essentially saying "even if this license is
non-free, you can probably get away with it anyway", though.)