Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:12:39PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> I believe "negligible" includes your viewpoint.
I'm not interested in arguing semantics; I believe I made my viewpoint quite
clear.
> My own question, when presented with any such cost, is on what basis
> it *is* free, since the DFSG tend to not allow a copyright owner to
> impose costs on users.
By that reasoning nothing is DFSG free, since you can't give up your right
to sue someone (at least not in the US).
--Adam
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>