Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:22:21PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Basically, the clincher for me is that our mirrors can't simply carry the
> software we distribute without coming under some fair degree of risk due to
> this issue.
What if the People's Republic of Kraplakistan made a law that all of its
citizens were due royalties whenever someone distributed a work for which
they held copyright, regardless of the license under which the works were
released? What if the law went on to declare that Kraplakistan courts
were granted jurisdiction over all distribution of such works?
Would you advocate making all copyrighted work non-free, or would you advocate
that we simply stop distributing material copyrighted by citizens of
Kraplakistan?
--Adam
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>