Re: Linuxsampler license

[Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com>]

On 9/16/05, Humberto Massa Guimarães <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br> wrote:
> > I just wonder how can BSD/MIT/... be "GPL compatible" not having
> > section 3 of the LGPL.
> 
> Everything distributable under the terms of BSD/MIT, is also
> distributable under the terms of the GPL because BSD/MIT (2 and
> 3 clauses) is *less* restrictive than the GPL.

Being less restrictive doesn't make it the GPL. Neither BSD nor MIT 
allow you to turn their licensing terms and conditions into GPL terms 
and conditions. 

regards,
alexander.