Re: CDDL
asuffield@debian.org wrote:
>> I especially liked the way you determine which arguments are correct
>> and which ones "standard responses"...
>The word 'correct' does not appear. A point is considered valid if it
>has no valid rebuttals. This is an elementary principle of debate.
s/correct/valid/
>I determine whether a point is a standard response by this very simple
>metric:
>
>If I personally am aware of this point occurring in the context of two
>or more distinct licenses, it's a standard response.
Being applicable in multiple cases does not make it wrong, you know.
--
ciao,
Marco
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CDDL
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- References:
- CDDL
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL
- From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: CDDL
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>