[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPL, yet again. (The kernel is a lot like a shared library)



On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:53:10PM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote:
> Now seriously, can you please explain to me:
> 
> 1. do you think programX is a derivative work of libopenssl?
> 2. why?
> 3. do you think programX is a derivative work of libnovossl?
> 4. why?
> 
> I keep making questions, and you keep giving me non-sequiturs.

You keep asking questions that don't have answers because you phrase
them in terms of dynamic linking all the time.

None of these four questions are answerable because the only thing
you've said is that programX is dynamically linked to libssl and that
both these packages contain a libssl file.

THAT IS NOT RELEVANT INFORMATION.

As I said the last time you asked this exact same question, it depends
on all the stuff you haven't said. I also sketched out the conditions
for the various possible answers. I'm not going to repeat it again.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: