Re: Dissident test
Marco d'Itri writes:
> mdpoole@troilus.org wrote:
>
>>DFSG#5 is very plain and very broad: it prohibits discrimination
>>against *any* person or group. If you think it should be narrowed,
>>propose an amendment to the SC.
> Until the DFSG-revisionists came here, the meaning of the DFSG #5 was
> to forbid licenses which provide the required freedoms only to some
> people.
Using that interpretation, choice-of-venue clauses provide freedom
from fees only to those who live in the chosen venue.
Again: If you think DFSG#5 is too broad, propose an amendment.
Michael Poole
Reply to: