Re: Dissident test

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:40:41AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> You seem to be making a call for interpreting the DFSG literally. I
> think this is impossible. We should stay as close to the spirit of the
> DFSG and we should rely on the text as our best clue. However, things
> will *always* come down to human judgment calls at one point or
> another.

So, is the spirit of the DFSG #5 to forbid choice-of-venue clauses, or the
anonymous contributions of the infamous dissident test ?

And who is to interpret the spirit of the different DFSG clauses :)

Friendly,

Sven Luther