Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> If the licensor doesn't have enough money to enforce them, then yes, I
> think they're pointless. What's the point of a license that you can't
> enforce?
A licence can communicate your wishes to others clearly and
it's a sort of promise to your collaborators that you won't
come back and hunt them down when you do have money to protect
your copyright.
I know some like to obsess about courts, but even without lawyer
backing, copyright licences have social and practical effects.
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Humberto Massa Guimarães <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>