On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:30:17PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > >> No, you are not "telling me why my argument is broken". If you are > >> trying, you're not being very clear. Why is my argument broken exactly? > > > > By trivially continuing it to the next obvious point, it concludes > > that the GPL doesn't work. Therefore it's broken somewhere. Figuring > > out where is left as an exercise for the students. I really don't care > > about the details. > > Ah, but this is based on the assumption that the GPL actually does > work. The argument was intended to show that it doesn't, and > apparently succeeds at this. I am acutely disinterested in that debate because it's long and boring, but there's a lot of law professors who like it and think that the GPL does work. I suggest you go argue with them instead. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature