Re: LGPL module linked with a GPL lib
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 11:30:15AM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On 7/30/05, Francesco Poli <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Well, let's say "Almost All Rights Reserved".
> > Anyway, it's still really far away from a DFSG-free document: that's
> > basically what I meant...
> Oddly enough, there is some useful knowledge out there that is not
> currently available in a DFSG-free document. :-) If I get to the
> point of being confident that it is a wise thing to do, I may
> "publish" some of this analysis in a more convenient form than you
> already have it (almost all of it is in one message or another in the
> debian-legal archives), and that "publication" may come with somewhat
> more liberal explicit terms about piecewise re-use (few, if any, of my
> d-l posts come with any more permissions than may be intrinsic to
> their having been posted to a publicly archived list). I doubt I
> shall ever attach a DFSG-free license to this work in monograph form;
> it's not a computer program or the documentation for a computer
> program, and it's not really something people should be making "bug
> fixes" to and re-publishing without a quite strong presumption that
> they take all of the risk for having changed its meaning or made it
> look as if the author offered it as authoritative.
You should find a license that fits your needs there.