Re: License question about regexplorer
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I talked with Branden yesterday and he explained this rather clearly.
> The requirement in the QPL is no different than the requirement in the
> GPL that source either accompany the binary, or that a "written offer
> be extended, good for 3 years, blah, blah, only charge a reasonable amount
> for copying and all that."
What about QPL 6c that says "if the items are not available to
the general public, and the initial developer requests a copy,
you must supply one"?
Arnoud
--
Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch patent attorney - Speaking only for myself
Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/
Reply to: