On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:31:20 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote: > > So in summary, I think that "10 million" is pure fiction. Maybe or maybe not. I'm not saying that those data should be trusted, nor am I saying that they shouldn't. /According/ to that statistical results, we can say that... > > Does it really matter? We don't have access to the Creative Commons > Web logs nor their referrer count for the "Some Rights Reserved" image > (which is what they use for counting), so we can't audit this number. > I don't see why we have to. We don't have to, actually. What I was saying was simply something like "If those data can be trusted, we can draw the following conclusions: ..." > > I'm going to modify the cc summary to say "many". Can we all agree to > "many"? I know that we have more than 5000 articles and images on > Wikitravel alone, and I'd say that's more than enough to call them > "many". This sounds like a good idea: it even enhances the summary longevity (it will be true in the foreseeable future, as well as now). -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpQfEmLBDEwM.pgp
Description: PGP signature