[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 3)



On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:45:38 +0000 Henning Makholm wrote:

> Scripsit Evan Prodromou <evan@debian.org>
[...]
> > That's true. However, for a work to be DFSG-free, source code must
> > be supplied.
> 
> Sure. But that doesn't mean that the *license* has to require it.
> 
> For a work to be free, it is enough that we *have* source code; the
> license itself does not need to demand source code, once in actual
> fact we have it.
> 
> The alternative would be that BSD-style licenses (and donations to the
> public domain) were not DFSG-free, which is clearly absurd.

Agreed entirely.

-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpMCS4amMkTg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: