On Sat, 2005-19-03 at 21:07 +0000, Henning Makholm wrote: > I'm not happy about this replacement either. It seems to say that if I > distribute the Work on a LAN behind a firewall I must also distribute > the Work once again to the same recipient, but this time on a > non-firewalled LAN. I think you're slightly conflating recommendations 3 (allow access-controlled private distribution) and 4 (Allow distribution of rights-restricted copies of works if unrestricted copies are also made available). Only for 4 is there any recommended license text. Replacement replacement text is of course welcome. B-) Maybe this, for a start? You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological measures *that prevent the recipient from exercising the rights granted to them by section 8a and section 3 of this License, unless you also distribute, publicly display, publicly perform or publicly digitally perform the Work for the same recipient without those measures.* In other words, you _can_ control who receives the work, but you can't control what they do with it, unless you also give them a version that they can exercise their license rights on. I find the whole anti-DRM part kinda self-defeating and wrongheaded. Can I not put a turnstile in my movie theater? Can I not put a lock on the front door of my art gallery? Can I not use a password on my home computer? ~Evan -- Evan Prodromou evan@bad.dynu.ca
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature