Re: Linux and GPLv2
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
> Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 à 14:09 +0100, Måns Rullgård a écrit :
>> Personally, I'd be very sceptical about releasing code under a license
>> containing a blanket permission to use it under another yet to be
>> written license. What if I don't at all agree with GPLv3?
>
> Given that the FSF has already written and recommended blatantly
> non-free licenses, I generally my software under the GPL v2 only.
I usually use the MIT/X11/BSD license. I can see some situations
where I might have preferred a copyleft license. However, the BSD
license is simple enough that I can understand it (I think), and I
don't need to worry about which libraries I link with, as long as I
don't distribute binaries (which is far too cumbersome anyway).
PS. Sorry for the blank mail. I slipped on the send button.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com
Reply to: